Historical perspective, an uncertain origin
Clinical outbreaks of an unknown disease characterised by severe reproductive losses in late gestational sows were noticedfor the first time in the late 1980’s.
The disease also affected piglets, increasing the number of weak-born and mortality rates in neonatal and nursery pigs, causing severe pneumonia and reducing growth performances.
The first outbreak of this new disease was reported in North Carolina, USA (1987). Just a few years later (1990), a clinically similar outbreak was described in Münster (Germany). No common link was found between the European and North American outbreaks. In the following years, it spread rapidly to other countries.
After using different names such as Mystery swine disease or Blue-ear pig disease, the current name Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome was finally adopted at the 1st International Congress on the disease (1992, USA).
Institute in Lelystad (The Netherlands) using porcine alveolar macrophages; the strain was named Lelystad virus. The Koch’s postulates were also fulfilled. One year later, the agent was isolated from the North-American outbreaks using cell line CL-2621; that strain was known as VR-2332.
Early genetic analysis demonstrated that:
- They were the same virus, but belonging to two distinct genotypes –nowadays, designated as two different virus species; PRRSV1 and PRRSV2-.
- They shared properties similar to other viruses from genus Arterivirus –known as Porarterivirus from 2016-.
The earliest evidence of PRRS virus comes from retrospective serological studies; antibodies have been detected in serum as early as 1979 (Canada). In the U.S., retrospective analysis found no evidence of infection until 1985. Its prevalence then increased rapidly in North-America until 1988-89, when clinical outbreaks were first reported. There was probably a similar pattern in Europe.
In Asia, first outbreaks were reported in Japan in 1988, but the presence of antibodies in serum has been retrospectively documented in South Korea from 1985.
These results suggest that PRRS virus probably circulated in domestic pigs for several years before the first outbreaks were reported.
Curiously, we are facing a disease caused by one virus with two different strains (now considered as two different species) that appeared almost simultaneously on three different continents. The explanation behind this phenomenon is unclear.
Nevertheless, at least three hypotheses for the uncertain origin of the virus have been postulated:
- Origin close in time. The virus originated just one decade before emerging in domestic pigs. This hypothesis would imply that two different genotypes appeared in a very short period of time and that the virus should have an excessively high mutation rate, even for PRRS virus.
- Origin far in time. The genotypes/species would have evolved independently. The most recent common ancestor would have existed at least 100 years before the first appearance of the disease. Using ORF3 as a molecular clock, it has been estimated that PRRS virus could have originated in 1880±15 years. Thus, genotypes evolved over decades in two different and isolated environments before they emerged in pigs.This estimation is compatible with the hypothesis postulated by Plagemann (2003). According to this author, PRRS virus originated from an ancestor similar to Lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (another Arterivirus) in mice from Eastern Europe. This ancestor jumped from mice to wild boars and then the movement of these animals to a hunting reserve in USA made it possible for the ancestor to spread in North America.Since then, the virus has evolved in parallel on both continents. Finally, changes in pork production would have facilitated the emergence of the disease. Despite of the congruency between this hypothesis and the molecular clock analysis, there is no evidence for the existence of a common ancestor in mice or wild boars.
- PRRS virus may have emerged in the former Soviet Union. After the Second World War, the ancestor could have arrived to Central and Western Europe.Again, changes in pork production and movement of breeding pigs or semen would have facilitated the spread of the virus and the emergence of the disease. It has been suggested that the virus could have entered in North-America by means of minipig imports.
© Laboratorios Hipra, S.A. 2023. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted, without the prior written consent of HIPRA.